ADVOCATE REBINA RAI

  These landmark judgments offer a clear vision of the CrPC and help us understand the reasoning behind a judge’s decision-making. 1. State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (1992) 2. Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P. (2014) 3. D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal (1997) 4. Joginder Kumar v. State of U.P. (1994) 5. T.V. Vatheeswaran v. State of Tamil Nadu (1983) 6. Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI (2022) 7. State of Gujarat v. Mirzapur Moti Kureshi Kassab Jamat (2005) 8. Rupan Deol Bajaj v. K.P.S. Gill (1995) 9. Sakiri Vasu v. State of U.P. (2008) 10. A.R. Antulay v. R.S. Nayak (1988) 

  Understanding the hierarchy of courts is crucial at the outset of any litigation, at least, that is my perspective. HIERARCHY OF COURTS SUPREME COURT  HIGH COURTS SUBORDINATE COURTS DISTRICT COURT(CIVIL) SESSIONS COURT(CRIMINAL) DISTRICT JUDGE SESSIONS JUDGE ADDITIONAL/ASSISTANT  DISTRICT JUDGE ADDITIONAL SESSION JUDGE CIVIL JUDGE CLASS I (Sr. Division) CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE CIVIL JUDGE CLASS II (Jr. Division) JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SECOND CLASS LOWER COURTS COURT OF SMALL CASES.               MUNSIFF                              LOK ADALAT

In the matter of Rohit Sharma Vs. A.M Market Place Pvt. Ltd. Court Upheld- Failure to file a written statement within 120 days from the date of service results in an absolute forfeiture of this right. Justice Mr. Manmohan  Justice Ms. Asha Menon

 Supreme Court on 15 April, 2025 said- If any newborn infant is trafficked from any hospital, the immediate action against the hospital should be suspension of licence to run the hospital over and above other actions in accordance with law.

 The Supreme Court on 15th April 2025 has upheld the constitutional validity of section 498A IPC, rejecting a challenge that claimed the provision violates Article14. The Court emphasized that Article 15 of the Constitution explicitly allows the State to enact special laws for the protection of women. It clarified that allegations of misuse of Section 498A must be assessed On a case-by-case basis, rather than by striking down the law itself. Justice Surya Kant  Justice N. Kotiswar Singh

 The Supreme Court remarked that the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 and the law of limitation, meant to assist the courts in the process of rendering justice, cannot curtail the power of the courts to render justice. 1. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA J. 2. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN J.